Sample interview questions: How do you handle situations where clients request changes that you believe could potentially harm or mislead readers?
Sample answer:
- Politely Decline the Request:
- Provide a well-reasoned explanation for why the requested changes could potentially harm or mislead readers.
- Emphasize the importance of maintaining journalistic integrity and upholding ethical standards in reporting.
-
Be respectful and open to further discussion to find alternative solutions that align with both your professional standards and the client’s objectives.
-
Offer Compromise:
- Propose adjustments or modifications to the requested changes that address the client’s concerns without compromising accuracy or integrity.
- Collaborate with the client to find a middle ground that meets their needs while preserving journalistic principles.
-
Clearly explain the rationale behind your suggestions and how they achieve a balance between the client’s goals and ethical reporting standards.
-
Provide Clear Evidence:
- If available, present concrete evidence or data that support your stance against the requested changes.
- Explain how the proposed changes might contradict facts, distort context, or present a biased or misleading narrative.
-
Use specific examples or case studies to illustrate the potential negative consequences of implementing the client’s requests.
-
Seek Guidance:
- Consult with colleagues, editors, or industry peers to gain their insights and perspectives on the situation.
- Obtain their opinions on the ethical implications of the requested changes and strategize potential courses of action.
-
Stay informed about relevant journalistic codes of ethics and guidelines to guide your decision-making process.
-
Maintain Professionalism:
- Keep your interactions with the client respectful, even if there is disagreement.
- Avoid be… Read full answer